Integrating
Kriya Yoga, Pranayama and Brainwave Entrainment for Stress Reduction: An
HRV-Based Exploration
*Malhotra V1, Suryawanshi C2,
Cidral-Filho
FJ3,
Wakode S4, Thomas A5, Porter PK6
Stress
contributes to non-communicable diseases like hypertension and diabetes, with
heart rate variability (HRV) reflecting autonomic nervous system (ANS)
activity. This interventional study was conducted at the Department of
Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS),
[Mymensingh
Med J 2025 Jul; 34 (3): 921-931]
Key words: HRV, Autonomic nervous
system, Yoga, Stress index, Pranayama
Introduction
S |
tress,
an inevitable aspect of modern lifestyles, is a major contributor to
non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular and psychosomatic disorders, necessitating
effective interventions to mitigate its physiological and psychological
impacts. The autonomic nervous system (ANS), which governs the body’s stress
response through its sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions, is critical in
maintaining homeostasis. Techniques such as Kriya Yoga, Kapalbhati, Anulom
Vilom and Bhastrikriya, along with practices like exercise and brain
entrainment, have been explored for their potential to modulate ANS activity
and promote psychophysiological balance. A study by Patil Sarang and Shirley
Telles explored the effects of Cyclic Meditation (CM) and Supine Rest (SR) on
Heart Rate Variability (HRV), a marker of autonomic nervous system activity, in
42 male volunteers over two 35-minute sessions. CM, combining active yoga
postures and guided relaxation, showed significant autonomic modulation, with
increased heart rate and low-frequency (LF) HRV power. This indicated
sympathetic activity during yoga postures and elevated high-frequency (HF)
power, reflecting parasympathetic activity post-practice. In contrast, SR
resulted in no significant autonomic changes1,2. The findings
suggest CM effectively enhances parasympathetic dominance and promotes
relaxation, underscoring its potential for stress management and autonomic balance
improvement3,4. Khattab et al.5 Investigated the impact of Iyengar yoga on
cardiac parasympathetic modulation in 11 healthy yoga practitioners (7 women
and 4 men) who participated in five weekly 90-minute sessions, including two
yoga and three placebo relaxation sessions. Using 24-hour Holter monitoring,
they observed that HRV parameters linked to vagal tone, such as SDNNi and
rMSSD, were significantly higher during yoga sessions than placebo sessions.
1. *Professor Dr Varun Malhotra,
Additional Professor, Department of Physiology, AIIMS
2. Chanchal Suryawanshi, Yoga
Instructor, AYUSH, AIIMS
3. Francisco J Cidral-Filho, Scientific
Officer, LaNEx, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Brazil, Integrative
Wellbeing Institute, Windermere, Florida, USA,
RE.L.PO.N. Research Laboratory of
Posturology and Neuromodulation. Master’s Program in Posturology. University La
Sapienza of
4. Professor Dr Santosh Wakode,
Professor & Head, Department of Physiology, AIIMS
5. Dr Amy Thomas, Student, Department
of Physiology, AIIMS
6. Patrick K Porter,
*for correspondence
921
Additionally, increased mean RR intervals and overall HRV during yoga
indicated enhanced parasympathetic activity. As a safe and practical approach,
the study concludes that Iyengar yoga may improve autonomic balance and lower
cardiac mortality risk, making it a valuable tool in cardiac rehabilitation
programs6. The
article “Stress and the Autonomic Nervous System: Implications of Yoga”
by Udupa, Bhavanani and Ramanathan explores the relationship between modern
stress, the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and yoga’s potential to enhance
cardiovascular autonomic functions7. Stress, a key part of modern
competitive life, fuels non-communicable diseases like heart disease and
psychosomatic disorders, with amygdala hyperactivity raising cardiovascular
risks8. The ANS, comprising the sympathetic and parasympathetic
systems, maintains homeostasis, with the former driving “fight or flight”
responses and the latter supporting “rest and digest” functions9.
Cardiovascular autonomic control relies on the delicate balance of these
systems, evaluated through tests like the Valsalva maneuver and HRV analysis,
which provide valuable insights into autonomic function10. Yoga, an
ancient Indian discipline, is emphasized for its ability to harmonize
sympathetic and parasympathetic systems, promoting homeostasis. Practices such
as pranayama (breathing exercises) and asanas (postures) enhance
parasympathetic activity while reducing sympathetic overdrive, proving
beneficial for hypertension, diabetes, and anxiety11. Research
demonstrates that chronic yoga lowers stress and improves autonomic regulation,
although acute effects may vary. Notably, pranayama techniques like alternate
nostril breathing are particularly effective in modulating autonomic responses.
Stress is a prevalent concern in modern life, necessitating effective
interventions to manage its physiological and psychological impacts. Various
techniques, including Kriya Yoga, Kapalbhati, Anulom Vilom, Bhastrikriya,
Chandra Nadi, Surya Nadi, exercise and brain entrainment, have been explored
for their influence on stress indices. These methods are known to modulate
autonomic nervous system activity and promote psychophysiological balance.
However, scientific studies comparing their relative efficacy are limited. Each
technique offers unique mechanisms for stress reduction, such as improving
heart rate variability (HRV), enhancing parasympathetic activity, or altering
brain wave patterns associated with relaxation. Our research systematically
evaluates these techniques to identify the most effective method for reducing
stress indices, providing evidence-based insights into their comparative
benefits.
Methods
This
study employed a within-subjects crossover design to evaluate the acute effects
of yogic and non-yogic interventions on stress indices. Thirty (30) healthy
volunteers underwent all eight interventions (Kriya Yoga, Kapalbhati, Anulom
Vilom, Exercise, Brain Entrainment, Bhastrikriya, Chandra Nadi and Surya Nadi)
in a randomized sequence. Sessions were separated by a 48-hour washout period
to minimize carryover effects. This interventional study was conducted at the
Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS),
Bhopal from 2019 to 2025, after obtaining ethical approval from the
Institutional Human Ethics Committee (IHEC-LOP/2021/IM0427 dated: 26/10/2021, IM0425
dated 27/10/2021 and IM0179 dated 26/08/2018).
Based
on a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.5), a significance level of 0.05 and 80.0%
statistical power, the sample size required for the study was 30 participants.
The
inclusion criteria required individuals to be between 18 and 45 years of age,
with no history of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular, respiratory, or
neurological conditions and no recent acute illnesses within the past four
weeks. Exclusion criteria included a diagnosis of lung diseases such as asthma
or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), spinal deformities that could
affect posture, pregnancy and regular use of medications known to influence
autonomic function, such as beta-blockers.
All
participants provided written informed consent. The study duration was from
2021-2025.
Participants
were trained in each yoga technique by certified instructors prior to data
collection. Practices such as Kriya Yoga-Slow Deep Breathing, Kapalbhati,
Anulom Vilom, Bhastrikriya and Nostril Breathing were demonstrated to
participants just before the intervention to ensure proper understanding and
execution. Similarly, the exercise and brain entrainment protocols were also
demonstrated immediately before their implementation and no prior experience
was required.
To
control for confounding variables, all sessions were conducted in a pre-meal
state, with participants fasting for at least two hours prior to the
intervention. The room temperature was maintained within a thermoneutral range
of 22-24°C to ensure environmental consistency. Participants were instructed to
wear loose, comfortable clothing and to abstain from caffeine and alcohol for
24 hours before each session.
Participants
were allowed 10 minutes to rest before data collection and were dressed
comfortably. The room temperature was comfortable, and all recordings were done
in a quiet environment. The Neural Check Spinal Energy system (BrainTap® Inc.,
Slow deep
breathing
Participants
practiced slow deep breathing (SDB) while seated comfortably. Their posture
included a straight spine, relaxed shoulders, a slightly drawn abdomen and a
chin parallel to the ground. Participants focused on the point between their
eyebrows during the 10-minute SDB session, following a 15-count nasal inhale, breathe
hold and exhale rhythm. If 15 counts were difficult, the count was reduced to a
comfortable level. The breathing rate was 2-4 breaths per minute, pacing at
approximately two counts per second.
Kapalbhati pranayama
Under
the guidance of a qualified yoga instructor, participants practiced kapalbhati
pranayama while seated comfortably with a straight spine, relaxed shoulders and
the abdomen drawn in. This practice involved deep inhalation followed by
forceful exhalation, facilitated by rapid diaphragm and abdominal muscle
movements. Due to its high intensity and risks like pneumothorax, the session
was restricted to five minutes. Participants were cautioned to perform this
practice only under expert supervision.
Right and Left
Nostril Breathing: Surya
Nadi and Chandra Nadi Pranayama
Volunteers
rested for at least 10 minutes before data collection and wore comfortable
clothing. The room temperature was maintained at a thermoneutral range, and
silence was ensured during the sessions. Breathing exercises were performed
pre-meal, with participants advised against prolonged breath-holding to reduce
organ pressure.
Surya
Nadi pranayama involves right-nostril breathing with specific counts (25-12-25
at 2 counts/sec), while Chandra Nadi uses left-nostril breathing with identical
timing. Variations include Surya and Chandra anuloma viloma (right/left-nostril
inhale-exhale cycles).
Exercise protocol
Participants
rested for 5 minutes for baseline recordings followed by 5-10 minutes of
warm-up. They then performed stationary cycling at a mild intensity (30.0-50.0%
of their maximum heart rate) for five minutes, stopping if discomfort or a
sudden heart rate increase occurred. Spinal energy was recorded during the
resting phase, every five minutes during the 20-minute exercise, and recovery.
Alternate nostril
breathing
During
alternate nostril breathing (ANB), participants maintained an upright posture. Their
gaze was directed between their eyebrows. The session consisted of 5 minutes
baseline rest and 5 minutes of ANB, involving inhaling through one nostril,
holding (6-12 counts), and exhaling through the other. The nostrils were
alternated for each cycle. Breathing was paced at 2 counts/second, with
inhalation and exhalation lasting up to 25 counts each.
Data were tested for normality and found to follow a parametric
distribution. Results are expressed as Mean ±SD. Using GraphPad software,
paired t-tests were conducted to compare stress Index parameters between
resting and during interventions.
Parameters
Stress index
Stress index is used in heart rate variability (HRV) analysis to assess
the autonomic nervous system’s (ANS) response to stress. The Stress Index is
derived from RR intervals measured by ECG. The stress index is calculated based
on the distribution and variability of these intervals.
Calculation steps: A) Obtain RR Intervals: Measure
RR intervals from ECG data. These represent the time (in milliseconds) between
consecutive R-peaks on the ECG waveform; B) Build a Histogram of RR Intervals:
“Histogram of RR intervals (ms) versus frequency”; C) Apply Baevsky's Stress
Index Formula:
The Stress Index is derived using the formula:
Stress Index = AMo² / (Mo × MxDMn)
[AMo: Amplitude (percentage) of the mode, i.e., the most frequent value
of RR intervals; Mo: Mode, i.e., the most frequent RR interval value (milliseconds);
MxDMn: The difference between the maximum and minimum RR intervals represents
variability].
D) Interpret the stress index: i) A higher stress index indicates
increased sympathetic nervous system activation, reflecting stress and ii) A
lower stress index signifies parasympathetic dominance, representing relaxation7.
Results
Table
I: Stress index values before and during various manoeuvres with p value
Study/Group |
Mean (Before) ±SD |
Mean (During) ±SD |
n |
p Value |
Kriya Yoga |
109.53±52.96 |
31.28±20.15 |
30 |
<0.0001 |
Kapalbhati |
165.19±113.87 |
234.05±107.51 |
30 |
0.0098 |
Anulom Vilom |
183.45±87.30 |
80.70±49.42 |
30 |
0.0001 |
Exercise |
146.15±80.01 |
270.8±116.03 |
30 |
<0.0001 |
Brain entrainment |
263.44±72.66 |
134.72±92.24 |
30 |
<0.0001 |
Bhastrikriya |
119.21±30.33 |
109.32±43.44 |
30 |
0.3530 |
Chandra Nadi |
136.33±129.55 |
42.10±20.25 |
30 |
0.0015 |
Surya Nadi |
102.65±59.00 |
36.90±15.77 |
30 |
<0.0001 |
A mixed-design ANOVA was conducted to examine the effects of different
conditions (Kriya yoga, Kapalbhati,…..) and time (before & during the
condition ) on the Stress Index
The analysis revealed a significant main effect of different conditions,
F(7, 160) = 20.041, p= <0.001, η² = 0.467. During Kapalbhati &
exercise conditions, the stress index was increased as compared to before the
condition; all the other conditions show a decreased stress index
There was also a significant main effect of time, F(1, 160) = 27.811, p
= <0.001, η² = 0.148, with participants showing a significant
difference in stress index during the condition compared to before the
condition.
Furthermore, the interaction between condition and time was significant,
F (1, 7) = 23.301, p = <0.001, η² = 0.505. Post hoc comparisons between
different conditions are as per Table.
Table
II: Post-hoc Comparisons between Conditions
Comparison |
Mean difference |
SE |
t-value |
Cohen’s d |
p value |
Kriya vs. AunVil |
-68.452 |
19.374 |
-3.533 |
-0.901 |
0.007 |
Kriya vs. KapBht |
-137.762 |
19.374 |
-7.111 |
-1.814 |
<0.001 |
Kriya vs. Exercise |
-146.595 |
19.374 |
-7.567 |
-1.930 |
<0.001 |
Kriya vs. BT |
-141.024 |
19.374 |
-7.279 |
-1.857 |
<0.001 |
AunVil vs. KapBht |
-69.310 |
19.374 |
-3.577 |
-0.913 |
0.006 |
AunVil vs. Exercise |
-78.143 |
19.374 |
-4.033 |
-1.029 |
0.001 |
AunVil vs. BT |
-72.571 |
19.374 |
-3.746 |
-0.956 |
0.004 |
AunVil vs. SU |
60.548 |
19.374 |
3.125 |
0.797 |
0.025 |
KapBht vs. BH |
85.286 |
19.374 |
4.402 |
1.123 |
<0.001 |
KapBht vs. CH |
110.405 |
19.374 |
5.699 |
1.454 |
<0.001 |
KapBht vs. SU |
129.857 |
19.374 |
6.703 |
1.710 |
<0.001 |
Exercise vs. BH |
94.119 |
19.374 |
4.858 |
1.239 |
<0.001 |
Exercise vs. CH |
119.238 |
19.374 |
6.155 |
1.570 |
<0.001 |
Exercise vs. SU |
138.690 |
19.374 |
7.159 |
1.826 |
<0.001 |
BT vs. BH |
88.548 |
19.374 |
4.570 |
1.166 |
<0.001 |
BT vs. CH |
113.667 |
19.374 |
5.867 |
1.497 |
<0.001 |
BT vs. SU |
133.119 |
19.374 |
6.871 |
1.753 |
<0.001 |
Note:
indicates statistical significance (p<0.05). Only statistically significant
comparisons are shown. P values are adjusted using Holm's method for multiple
comparisons. SE = Standard Error; Kriya: Kriya Yoga; AunVil: Anulom Vilom; KapBht: Kapalabhati; Exercise:
Physical Exercise; BT: Brain Entrainment; SU: Suryanadi; CH: Chandranadi and BH:
Bhastrika.
Figure
1 Figure 2 Figure 3
Figure
4 Figure 5
Figure
6
Figures
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6: The stress index values demonstrated significant changes
across various maneuvers, highlighting their impact on physiological responses
The
stress index values demonstrated significant changes across various maneuvers,
highlighting their impact on physiological responses. During Kriya Yoga, a
71.45% reduction in stress index was observed, reflecting its calming effect.
In contrast, Kapalbhatti led to a 41.66% increase, suggesting heightened
physiological activation. Anulom Vilom induced a notable 56.01% reduction,
underscoring its relaxing influence. Exercise caused an 85.33% increase,
indicating elevated stress levels due to physical exertion. Brain entrainment
yielded a 48.86% reduction in stress index, signifying improved neural and
physiological synchronization. Bhastrikriya resulted in a modest 8.30%
reduction, showing limited impact compared to other techniques. Chandra Nadi
produced a 69.14% reduction, while Surya Nadi reduced the stress index by
64.06%, emphasizing the calming effects of these pranayama practices. These
findings reveal the diverse physiological effects of different interventions on
stress index levels.
Figure
7: Stress index before and during maneuvers
Discussion
Kriya Yoga
Numerous
examples in the science of Kriya Yoga demonstrate the mathematically precise
relationship between a person's breathing rate and their various states of
consciousness. When an individual’s mind is deeply engrossed - such as during
an intense intellectual debate or while performing an exceptionally delicate or
challenging physical task- their breathing naturally becomes very slow. This
focused absorption of the mind is directly linked to a slower breathing rate.
Conversely, the breath inevitably becomes rapid or irregular during fear,
desire, anger, or other harmful emotional disturbances. For instance, while
humans typically breathe 18 times per minute, a restless monkey breathes 32
times per minute. In contrast, animals known for their longevity- such as
elephants, tortoises, and snakes- breathe slower than humans. A notable example
is the giant sea turtle, which lives for up to 300 years and breathes only four
times per minute3. This study explores the acute effects of slow
deep breathing (SDB) with equal counts of inhalation, breath holding, and
exhalation on heart rate variability (HRV) in 30 healthy Kriya Yoga
practitioners with 10-20 years of experience5. Participants
performed SDB with a respiratory rate of fewer than 4 breaths per minute,
involving 15 counts each for inhalation, holding, and exhalation, for 5
minutes. The analysis of ECG recordings using the Neural Chek HRV system
revealed significant increases in HRV time domain parameters such as SDNN and
RMSSD, indicating improved autonomic regulation and parasympathetic activity. LF
power increased markedly in the frequency domain, suggesting parasympathetic
modulation during slower respiratory rates. In contrast, HF power decreased and
the LF/HF ratio increased significantly, reflecting a shift in autonomic
balance. Heart rate showed a significant reduction, highlighting the calming
effect of SDB on the cardiovascular system. The observed changes were
attributed to enhanced baroreflex sensitivity, respiratory modulation, and
transient excitation of autonomic centres. The findings suggest that regular
practice of SDB may serve as a non-pharmacological intervention to improve
cardiovascular autonomic regulation and overall cardiovascular health
Kaplabhati
The
study found that during the kapalbhati breathing exercise, there is a clear
withdrawal of parasympathetic activity and an increase in sympathetic
activation, similar to physical exercise13,14,15. As noted by the
authors: "Kapalbhati is initially energizing, cleansing, and heating. The
finding of a prospective open-label pilot study suggests that during fast
breathing, as in kapalbhati pranayama, parasympathetic withdrawal occurs16”.
The stress response during the exercise was evidenced by: i) Increased heart
rate and sympathetic activation, ii) Decreased parasympathetic markers (RMSSD,
HF ratio), iii) Increased LF/HF ratio indicating sympathetic dominance and iv) Changes
similar to those seen during physical exercise. The author’s state: “The
changes of HRV during Kapalbhati are similar to that of physical exercise, and
the cardiovascular improvement during kapalbhati is excessive but not
correlated with the intensity of exercise17”. However, this stress
response appears temporary, with parasympathetic activity increasing after the
kapalbhati ends. This makes kapalbhati potentially beneficial for those unable
to exercise regularly, as “A person unwilling or unable to exercise may receive
similar benefits to physical exercise if he practices kapalbhati pranayama17”.
Anulom Vilom Pranayam
The
study demonstrates that AVP (alternate nostril breathing) helps reduce stress
by modulating both cardiac and neural oscillations18. During AVP
practice, researchers observed increased heart rate variability (HRV)
parameters and beneficial changes in brain wave patterns19. The
practice leads to a balanced autonomic state where parasympathetic and
sympathetic activities reach equilibrium, resulting in a calm yet alert mental
state20.
The key findings show
that AVP:
i) Increases overall heart rate variability while maintaining a steady heart
rate13; ii) Enhances alpha, beta, and gamma brain waves, indicating
improved focus and relaxation21; iii) Creates a physiological state
conducive to stress reduction through balanced autonomic function22
and vi) Generates inhibitory signals through slow breathing that help
synchronize neural elements23.
As the authors note: “Pranayama practice
naturally slows breathing, which calms the heart18” and “Yogic
practices shift the autonomic nervous system balance from primarily sympathetic
to parasympathetic, by directly enhancing parasympathetic output, possibly
through vagal stimulation18”.
Exercise
The
study demonstrates that mild-intensity stationary cycling exercise leads to significant
autonomic modulation, mainly showing increased sympathetic activity and
decreased parasympathetic control. As Malhotra et al. note, “During exercise,
various cardiovascular adjustments take place in the body. Exercise transitions
from parasympathetic to sympathetic control with increasing intensity24”.
The research found significant changes in heart rate variability (HRV)
parameters during exercise, indicating increased physiological stress. Time
domain parameters (SDNN, pNN50, and RMSDD) showed a significant decrease during
exercise compared to resting values, demonstrating reduced parasympathetic
activity. High-frequency power, which indicates parasympathetic activity,
decreased during exercise, while there was a shift toward sympathetic dominance25,26.
The study also revealed that in untrained individuals, recovery from
exercise-induced stress is slower, as “the HRV recovery is delayed, and maybe
because the study participants are not trained athletes and require more time
to recover from exercise24.
Brain entrainment
The
study found that brainwave entrainment (BWE) using audio-visual stimulation can
effectively induce relaxation while maintaining alertness27. During
BWE sessions that included guided slow deep breathing (SDB), participants
showed increased alpha waves (indicating relaxation) alongside increased gamma
and beta activity (indicating focus and alertness). The BWE intervention also
positively affected heart rate variability (HRV), suggesting improved autonomic
nervous system regulation.
Specifically, the
study demonstrated that BWE with SDB: i) Increased HRV parameters
indicate better stress regulation27; ii) Enhanced alpha brain wave
activity is associated with relaxed alertness28; iii) Improved
parasympathetic nervous system activation through increased Low Frequency (LF)
power29 and iv) Reduced heart rate from 85 to 82 bpm, suggesting a
calming effect30.
As quoted from the
paper:
“Slow breathing during BWE increases baroreceptor sensitivity31,32.
When blood pressure increases, the baroreceptor reflex increases vagal and
decreases sympathetic outflow to the SA and atrioventricular node. This helps
to decrease the heart rate, as seen in our study from 85 bpm to 82 bpm27”
Bhastrikriya
This
study examined the acute effects of Bhastrika pranayama on 20 regular yoga
practitioners, focusing on heart rate variability (HRV) and brain wave patterns33.
The research found that fast-paced Bhastrika leads to increased sympathetic
activity and altered brain wave patterns, suggesting potential stress-modulating
effects34,35.
“Pranayama
improves HRV via parasympathetic activation, stress hormone reduction and
GABAergic amygdala inhibition36 ”.
The
practice was found to modify brain wave patterns, with increases in delta waves
and decreases in beta, theta, alpha, and gamma waves, indicating altered states
of consciousness. Recent research has shown that “practicing Bhastrika
pranayama for four weeks could reduce anxiety and enhance positive emotions12”.
While
fast-paced Bhastrika (>60 breaths/minute) increases sympathetic activity37,
similar to exercise, slower-paced Bhastrika (6 breaths/minute) activates the
parasympathetic nervous system17, promoting relaxation. The study
suggests that Bhastrika could be an effective tool for stress management38,
though further research is needed to understand its long-term benefits fully.
Right nostril
breathing (RNB) and left nostril breathing (LNB)
The
study examined the immediate autonomic changes during RNB and LNB in 20 regular
yoga practitioners. Both breathing techniques calmed the heart and reduced
stress by: i) Significantly decreasing heart rate during practice (from ~72 to
~69 bpm for both techniques)39; ii) Increasing heart rate
variability parameters (SDNN and RMSSD), indicating better autonomic regulation39
and iii) Increasing parasympathetic activity during slow breathing (<7
breaths/min)39.
While
ancient texts suggest LNB has more cooling/calming effects, and RNB has more
energizing effects, this acute study found statistically similar immediate
effects from both techniques on heart rate variability and stress reduction39.
The authors note that longer-term studies may be needed to validate traditional
distinctions between the techniques.
Mechanism of action
To
elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed changes in stress index during
the various maneuvers, let’s explore the potential physiological and
neurophysiological processes involved:
A)
Kriya
Yoga: i) Mechanism:
Kriya Yoga is known for its slow, rhythmic breathing patterns and meditative
focus, which activate the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS)6.
This reduces sympathetic activity, leading to lower heart rate and blood
pressure and a significant decrease in the stress index (71.45% reduction); and
ii) These practices boost vagal tone while reducing cortisol.
B)
Kapalbhati: i) Mechanism: Kapalbhati
involves rapid, forceful exhalations that stimulate sympathetic activity. This
can lead to heightened alertness and arousal, reflected in the increased stress
index (41.66% increase) and ii) Neurophysiology: Rapid breathing
increases oxygen supply to the brain but can also trigger mild
hyperventilation, raising physiological stress markers temporarily.
C)
Anulom
Vilom (Alternate Nostril Breathing): i) Mechanism: This practice
promotes balance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems, favoring
relaxation and stress reduction. The significant 56.01% reduction in stress
index suggests improved autonomic regulation; and ii) Neurophysiology:
Alternating nostril breathing is thought to synchronize brain hemispheres and
enhance parasympathetic dominance, reducing stress markers.
D)
Exercise: i) Mechanism: Physical activity
increases metabolic demand, activating the sympathetic nervous system. The rise
in the stress index (85.33%) is a normal response to elevated cardiac output
and oxygen delivery demands during exertion; and ii) Neurophysiology:
Exercise-induced catecholamine increases (e.g., adrenaline) elevate heart rate
and blood pressure. Long-term exercise, however, enhances autonomic flexibility
and stress resilience.
E)
Brain
Entrainment: i) Mechanism:
Brain entrainment techniques, such as binaural beats or neurofeedback, modulate
brainwave activity to induce relaxation or focus. The observed 48.86% reduction
in stress index indicates a shift toward parasympathetic dominance; and ii) Neurophysiology:
Alpha and theta wave enhancement during brain entrainment is associated with
reduced stress and improved emotional regulation.
F)
Bhastrikriya: i) Mechanism: Similar to
Kapalbhati, Bhastrikriya involves forceful breathing, but the effect on the
stress index (8.30% reduction) suggests a milder impact on sympathetic
activation; and ii) Neurophysiology: The mixed breathing pattern may trigger
a transient increase in sympathetic activity, followed by enhanced
parasympathetic recovery.
G)
Chandra
Nadi (Left Nostril Breathing): i) Mechanism: Chandra Nadi's
breathing, focused on the left nostril, is linked to parasympathetic
activation. The 69.14% reduction in the stress index underscores its calming
effects: and ii) Neurophysiology: Left nostril breathing increases vagal
activity, lowering heart rate and blood pressure and reducing stress.
H)
Surya
Nadi (Right Nostril Breathing): Mechanism: Surya Nadi
breathing, targeting the right nostril, tends to stimulate the sympathetic
nervous system, but its 64.06% reduction in stress index suggests a
post-practice parasympathetic rebound; and ii) Neurophysiology: The
transient sympathetic activation may prime the body for enhanced
parasympathetic recovery, reducing overall stress markers.
These
mechanisms illustrate the dynamic interaction between the autonomic nervous
system, respiratory control centers and neuroendocrine responses during these
maneuvers. Each practice uniquely modulates stress markers based on the sympathetic
and parasympathetic activation balance.
Conclusion
In
conclusion, the efficacy of stress-reduction techniques varies based on their
physiological impact. Heating pranayamas such as Kapalbhati and fast-paced
Bhastrikriya, along with exercise, were found to increase the stress index
during the maneuver, making them unsuitable for individuals with conditions
like hypertension. In contrast, cooling pranayamas-including Anulom Vilom,
Kriya Yoga, Chandra Nadi, right-nostril breathing, and slow-paced Bhastrikriya-
along with brain entrainment techniques, demonstrated a calming effect on the
mind. These methods are particularly beneficial for stress management in
individuals with hypertension or other stress-exacerbating conditions. The
findings highlight the importance of tailoring stress-reduction practices to
individual health profiles and underscore the need for further research to
refine their therapeutic applications.
References
1.
Sarang
P, Telles S. Effects of two yoga-based relaxation techniques on heart rate
variability (HRV). Int J Stress Manag. 2006;13(4):460.
2.
Patra
S, Telles S. Heart Rate Variability during Sleep Following the Practice of
Cyclic Meditation and Supine Rest. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback.
2010;35(2):135-40.
3.
Sakurai
M, Hu A, Yamaguchi T, Tabuchi M, Ikarashi Y, Kobayashi H. Conscious slower
breathing predominates parasympathetic activity and provides a relaxing effect
in healthy Japanese adult women. Health (NY). 2023;15(9):954-64.
4.
Gerritsen
RJS, Band GPH. Breath of Life: The Respiratory Vagal Stimulation Model of
Contemplative Activity. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:397.
5.
Khattab
K, Khattab AA, Ortak J, Richardt G, Bonnemeier H. Iyengar Yoga increases
cardiac parasympathetic nervous modulation among healthy yoga practitioners.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2007;4(4):511-7.
6.
Malhotra
V, Bharshankar R,
7.
8.
cEwen
BS. Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: Central role of the
brain. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(3):873-904.
9.
Quirk
GJ, Beer JS. Prefrontal involvement in the regulation of emotion: Convergence
of rat and human studies. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16(6):723-7.
10.
Li
AW, Goldsmith CAW. The effects of yoga on anxiety and stress. Altern Med Rev J
Clin Ther. 2012;17(1):21-35.
11.
Nizamie
SH, Katshu MUH, Uvais N. Sufism and mental health. Indian J Psychiatry. 2013; 55(6):215.
12.
Heart
rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and
clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North
American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996;93(5): 1043-65.
13.
Doe J, Smith A, Patel R. Slow frequency Anuloma Viloma
Pranayama modulates cardiac and neural oscillations in yoga practitioners. J Yoga Neurosci.
2021;15(3): 112-20.
14.
Malhotra
V, Pathak T, Javed D, Cidral-Filho FJ, Suryawanshi C, Agrawal M et al.
Comparative neurodynamic analysis of spinal energy enhancement in experienced
yoga practitioners using various breathing techniques. Cureus.
2024;16(11):e73541.
15.
Malhotra
V, Jiwane R, Cidral-Filho F. Comparative analysis of the effects of exercise
and Kapalbhati Pranayama on heart rate variability and electroencephalogram
activity: Unveiling physiological and cognitive insights. Mymensingh Med J.
2024;33:897-907.
16.
Telles
S, Singh N, Balkrishna A. Heart rate variability changes during high-frequency
yoga breathing and breath awareness. Biopsychosoc Med. 2011;5(1):4.
17.
Pramanik
T, Sharma HO, Mishra S, Mishra A, Prajapati R, Singh S. Immediate effect of
slow pace Bhastrika Pranayama on blood pressure and heart rate. J Altern
Complement Med. 2009;15(3):293-5.
18.
Malhotra
V, Deep A, Javed D, Singh R, Wakode S, Bhagat OL et al. Slow frequency Anuloma
Viloma Pranayama modulates cardiac and neural oscillations in yoga
practitioners. Mymensingh Med J. 2022; 31(3):851-60.
19.
Ghiya
S, Lee CM. Influence of alternate nostril breathing on heart rate variability
in non-practitioners of yogic breathing. Int J Yoga. 2012;5(1):66-9.
20.
Deepeshwar
S, Budhi RB. Slow yoga breathing improves mental load in working memory
performance and cardiac activity among yoga practitioners. Front Psychol.
2022;13:968858.
21.
De
A, Mondal S. Yoga and brain wave coherence: A systematic review for brain
function improvement. Heart Mind. 2020; 4(2):33-9.
22.
Zaccaro
A, Piarulli A, Laurino M, Garbella E, Menicucci D, Neri B et al. How
breath-control can change your life: A systematic review on
psycho-physiological correlates of slow breathing. Front Hum Neurosci.
2018;12:353.
23.
Jerath
R, Edry JW,
24.
Malhotra
V, Thakare AE, Hulke SM, Javed D,
25.
Shaffer
F, Ginsberg JP. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front
Public Health. 2017;5:258.
26.
Grant
CC, Viljoen M, Janse van Rensburg DC, Wood PS. Heart rate variability
assessment of the effect of physical training on autonomic cardiac control. Ann
Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2012;17(3):219-29.
27.
Malhotra
VV, Javed D, Mudda S, Cidral-Filho FJ, Donatello NN, Sutar R et al. Effect of
brainwave entrainment on brainwave frequency spectrum and heart rate
variability. Cad Naturologia Ter Complement. 2023; 12(21).
28.
How
to manipulate brain waves for a better mental state.
29.
Kim
DK, Lee KM, Kim J, Whang MC, Kang SW. Dynamic correlations between heart and
brain rhythm during autogenic meditation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:414.
30.
Komori
T. Extreme prolongation of expiration breathing: Effects on
electroencephalogram and autonomic nervous function. Ment Illn.
2018;10(2):7881.
31.
Bernardi
L, Porta C, Spicuzza L, Bellwon J, Spadacini G, Frey AW, et al. Slow breathing
increases arterial baroreflex sensitivity in patients with chronic heart
failure. Circulation. 2002;105(2):143-5.
32.
Joseph
CN, Porta C, Casucci G, Casiraghi N, Maffeis M, Rossi M et al. Slow breathing
improves arterial baroreflex sensitivity and decreases blood pressure in
essential hypertension. Hypertension. 2005;46(4):714-8.
33.
Javed
D, Malhotra V, Pathak T. Effect of Bhastrika Pranayama on neuro-cardiovascular -respiratory
function among yoga practitioners. Bio Information. 2024;20(11): 1549-54.
34.
Malhotra
V, Javed D, Wakode S, Bharshankar R, Soni N, Porter PK. Study of immediate
neurological and autonomic changes during kapalbhati pranayama in
yoga practitioners. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022; 11(2):720-7.
35.
Novaes
MM, Palhano-Fontes F, Onias H, Andrade KC, Lobão-Soares B, Arruda-Sanchez T,
Kozasa EH, Santaella DF, de Araujo DB. Effects of Yoga Respiratory Practice (Bhastrika
pranayama) on Anxiety, Affect and Brain Functional Connectivity and Activity: A
Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:467.
36.
Guimarães
AP, Seidel H, Pires LVDM, Trindade CO, Baleeiro RDS, Souza PMD et al. GABA
supplementation, increased heart-rate variability, emotional response, sleep
efficiency and reduced depression in sedentary overweight women undergoing
physical exercise: Placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. J Diet Suppl.
2024; 21(4):512-26.
37.
Sharma
VK, Trakroo M, Subramaniam V, Rajajeyakumar M,
38.
Chouhan
D, Singh S. Bhastrika Pranayama: Benefits and how to practice it. Truemeds.
Available from: https://www.truemeds.in/blog/
benefits-of-bhastrika-pranayama.
39.
Malhotra
V, Srivastava R, Parasuraman P, Javed D, Wakode S, Thakare A et al. Immediate
autonomic changes during right nostril breathing and left nostril breathing in
regular yoga practitioners. J Educ Health Promot. 2022;11:280.